I like that I've been seeing a lot more cops on the road lately. DPS has stepped up its traffic enforcement and I like it. I like that there are fewer tour vans speeding past me in heavy traffic - you know the ones, the white ones. I like that more people are driving at the speed limit, although I'm seeing a lot of people driving under the speed limit - I hope they understand that driving
too slow can also be a violation. What I am not seeing, however, is a reduction in the number of times I am cut off during any given drive. Simply driving at a reasonable speed does not a great driver make.
Know what else I am not seeing? The point in widening back road. I really don't know much about this project, but like the
security gate at the hospital, I don't think it is necessary. People already drive recklessly along the twisted hilly back road, do we really want to open it up to four lanes? Do we really want to say, here's another lane so you can pass that car along a curve at the peak of an incline?
Was there a traffic study that uncovered a need to cut into the limestone hills and back fill the long deep drop offs destroying vegetation because we need to add two more lanes to the entire length of the road? (This is going to be done to the entire length of the road, is it not?) I just don't buy it. Sure, back road sees its fair share of use, but I never see it truly congested; slow cars eventually turn off, big trucks pull over. I mean, really, four lanes? Really?
I am generally not in the know when it comes to this sort of thing, but I did not hear that such a pressing need existed. Could we not have put this money to better use by adding a center lane at certain points of high traffic and fixing the many other roads on island that are full of pot holes and are in dire need of repair? Could we not have put some of this money to use in repainting the many lane markings that have faded into nothing making certain intersections dangerous, especially for our guests who are not familiar with the lay of the roads? Did we decide on this because the funding is specific to this type of project and we wanted to spend the money which, on the one hand is helpful to our economy, but on the other hand is being spent on a project that really isn't needed and may potentially prove to be harmful? I don't know. But I'm not happy about it.
Another thing I'm not happy about? The chicken tree on Capitol Hill. You know, the tree that is on government property that si dude decided to paint into a chicken, or perhaps it is a duck? The tree that dude thinks is fun to dress up for each upcoming holiday or major event - a graduate in June, a fowl Santa in December, a leprechaun in March, and most recently a bunny in April.

I was pretty irritated when the chicken first appeared. I think others were too because I saw a government worker paint the chicken brown one day in hopes to make it look more tree-like. I don't understand why they didn't just cut it down, because soon after the paint job, dude was back, re-chickening the tree. I later came to laugh at it. But now I'm just sick of it. It is not on his personal property, the area around it is not maintained by him, it's a stupid joke really. The more I see it, the more disrespectful I find it to be. Maybe I should go into his yard and paint one of his trees into a giraffe. He'd probably like that.
In honor of Looney Tunes, won't you sing it with me? "Kill the Waaabiiiit!"